Is Bookmaker.eu Legal in the US? State-by-State Guide for 2026
Quick Answer
No US state licenses Bookmaker.eu, and no federal law makes it a crime to place a bet there. Bookmaker takes players in 46 states plus DC, and geo-blocks Kentucky, New Jersey, Ohio and Tennessee outright. Accepting your signup isn’t the same as being legal where you live, a few states have laws written to reach bettors, not just operators. If a dispute comes up, there’s no state regulator to take it to.
- Accepts players 46 states + DC
- Geo-blocked KY, NJ, OH, TN
- US license None (Costa Rica)
- Our rating 9.2 / 10
Spooky Express earns a commission if you sign up through our links. It never affects our ratings or which books we recommend – read our affiliate disclosure.
Legal vs. Legitimate: Two Different Questions
Most arguments about offshore betting go nowhere because people use one word for two different things.
A book is legal when a US state has licensed it. FanDuel holds a license from the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, pays state tax, and answers to that regulator when a customer complains. A book is legitimate when it’s a real business with a real payout history, which is a claim about whether you’ll get your money, not about whether a regulator is standing behind you.
Bookmaker.eu is the second kind. It’s been paying customers since 1996 and settles crypto withdrawals inside a day, but it holds no US license, so nobody in this country is obligated to help you if something goes wrong.
| Regulated US book | Offshore book (Bookmaker.eu) | |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed by | A state regulator, such as the NJ Division of Gaming Enforcement | Registered in Costa Rica; no US license of any kind |
| If you have a dispute | File a complaint with the state gaming commission | The book’s own support desk; no regulator to appeal to |
| Tax paperwork | W-2G issued; winnings reported to the IRS | Nothing issued or reported; you report it yourself |
| Player protections | Mandated deposit limits, self-exclusion, audited pricing | Voluntary tools, set and enforced by the operator |
| Where you can bet | Inside one state’s borders, enforced by geolocation | 46 states plus DC, no geofencing |
| Betting limits | Often low on props; winning accounts get limited | High limits; winners are generally left alone |
That distinction is why the rest of this page talks about the states where Bookmaker accepts players, not “legal states.” The two aren’t the same thing, and anyone blurring them is usually selling you something.
Where Bookmaker.eu Accepts Players: All 50 States
Bookmaker publishes its own blocked list, and as of it names four US states: Kentucky, New Jersey, Ohio and Tennessee. Everywhere else, 46 states plus DC, the signup form will take you (source).
What that list will not tell you is whether you have a regulated alternative at home, and that is the question that decides whether an offshore account is worth opening. A bettor in Texas has no licensed option at all. A bettor in Colorado has a dozen. Both can bet at Bookmaker. Only one of them has a reason to.
| State | Bookmaker.eu | Regulated betting | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Accepts | None | No legal option in state |
| Alaska | Accepts | None | No legal option in state |
| Arizona | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Arkansas | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| California | Accepts | None | Largest state with no legal betting |
| Colorado | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Connecticut | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Delaware | Accepts | Online and retail | Confirm current online status |
| Florida | Accepts | Online and retail | Single operator, Hard Rock |
| Georgia | Accepts | None | Not the restricted country of Georgia |
| Hawaii | Accepts | None | No legal gambling of any kind |
| Idaho | Accepts | None | No legal option in state |
| Illinois | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Indiana | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Iowa | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Kansas | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Kentucky | Blocked | Online and retail | Signups blocked |
| Louisiana | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Maine | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Maryland | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Massachusetts | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Michigan | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Minnesota | Accepts | None | No legal option in state |
| Mississippi | Accepts | Retail only | On property mobile only |
| Missouri | Accepts | Online and retail | Launched December 2025 |
| Montana | Accepts | Retail only | Lottery kiosks in licensed venues |
| Nebraska | Accepts | Retail only | No state licensed app |
| Nevada | Accepts | Online and retail | In person registration required |
| New Hampshire | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| New Jersey | Blocked | Online and retail | Signups blocked |
| New Mexico | Accepts | Retail only | Tribal casinos, no statute |
| New York | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| North Carolina | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| North Dakota | Accepts | Retail only | Tribal casinos only |
| Ohio | Blocked | Online and retail | Signups blocked |
| Oklahoma | Accepts | None | Tribal compact talks ongoing |
| Oregon | Accepts | Online and retail | Lottery run app |
| Pennsylvania | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Rhode Island | Accepts | Online and retail | Single operator |
| South Carolina | Accepts | None | No legal option in state |
| South Dakota | Accepts | Retail only | Deadwood and tribal casinos |
| Tennessee | Blocked | Online only | Signups blocked, no retail books |
| Texas | Accepts | None | Repeated bills have failed |
| Utah | Accepts | None | Constitutional ban on gambling |
| Vermont | Accepts | Online only | No retail books |
| Virginia | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Washington | Accepts | Retail only | Tribal casinos only. See state law |
| West Virginia | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| Wisconsin | Accepts | Retail only | Tribal casinos only |
| Wyoming | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
| District of Columbia | Accepts | Online and retail | – |
The Four States Bookmaker Blocks
All four run mature, regulated online markets with active regulators, and Bookmaker blocks them at the signup form rather than take the fight. Bookmaker does not publish its reasoning, so treat any explanation you read elsewhere as informed guesswork. The practical effect is simple: your state will not appear in the dropdown.
Georgia: The Country, Not the State
Worth clearing up, because it trips people up. Georgia appears on Bookmaker’s restricted list, but that is the country. Bookmaker tags its US entries explicitly, as in “Kentucky State (US)”, and Georgia sits alphabetically among the nations between French Guyana and Germany. Georgians in the US can open an account, which matters, because Georgia has no regulated sportsbook of its own.
If You Are in a Blocked State
Skip the VPN. Bookmaker’s policy says circumventing its restrictions may result in “account closure and the forfeiture of funds”, and the place that gets enforced is the withdrawal window, after identity verification, which is to say after your money is already inside. Kentucky, New Jersey, Ohio and Tennessee all have licensed online sportsbooks operating at home. Use them.
Federal Law: The Wire Act, UIGEA and PASPA
Three federal laws come up in every offshore betting argument. None of them targets you.
The Wire Act (1961) predates the internet by decades and was written for mob-run wire rooms. It applies to anyone “engaged in the business of betting or wagering” who uses a wire facility to transmit bets (18 U.S.C. §1084) — a bookmaker, in other words, not a customer. The DOJ read it narrowly in 2011, reversed itself in a November 2018 opinion, then lost in federal appeals court in 2021 when the First Circuit held it covers sports betting only.
UIGEA (2006) is a payments law. It bars a business in the betting trade from accepting cards, transfers or checks tied to unlawful internet gambling (31 U.S.C. §5363). The obligations land on banks and processors, not bettors, which is exactly why your Visa deposit gets declined while a Bitcoin deposit clears in minutes. Note the word “unlawful” — UIGEA borrows its definition from state law, so the question routes back to where you live.
PASPA died in 2018. In Murphy v. NCAA, the Supreme Court struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports betting, and every state got to write its own rules. That decision is why the table above exists.
Put together: no federal statute makes the individual bettor the target. State law is where the real variation lives.
State Law: Where Bettors Face Actual Risk
Most state gambling statutes are written to catch operators. A few are broad enough to reach the person placing the bet. One state stands out.
Washington
Washington is the strictest state in the country
Washington law makes it a class C felony to knowingly transmit or receive gambling information over the internet (RCW 9.46.240). The penalty tops out at five years and a $10,000 fine (RCW 9A.20.021). The exemption applies only to gambling the state has authorized, which covers tribal-compact sports betting but not an offshore account.
The statute was last amended in 2020, by the same act that legalized tribal sports wagering. The legislature had this language in front of it and kept it.
Bookmaker still accepts Washington signups, so the book’s own policy is looser than state law. That leaves the burden with you.
Prosecutions of recreational bettors are rare, and we are not aware of a wave of them. Rarely enforced is not the same as legal. If you live in Washington, that is a question for an attorney rather than a betting site.
Everywhere Else
In the other 49 states, enforcement has gone after operators and payment processors rather than customers. That pattern shows up in the DOJ’s Wire Act cases, in UIGEA’s design as a banking rule, and in the cease and desist letters state regulators mail to offshore books.
What you never get is recourse. In a regulated state you can escalate a dispute to the gaming commission. With an offshore book, the operator’s support desk is the end of the line.
This is general information, not legal advice.
Is Bookmaker.eu Legitimate?
Legitimacy is a different question from legality, and this is the strongest part of Bookmaker’s case.
The book has taken online action since 1996 and is registered in Costa Rica, a jurisdiction that issues business registrations rather than gambling licenses. No gaming regulator audits its pricing, certifies its payouts or hears customer disputes. What it has instead is three decades of settling bets, plus a reputation among high-volume players for paying without argument and leaving winning accounts alone.
We score it 9.2 out of 10. Safety, licensing and trust carries the heaviest weight in our rating system at 20 percent, and the missing US license is what keeps the score out of the mid-nines despite the payout record.
Bookmaker.eu
Online since 1996 · Registered in Costa Rica · No US state license
What holds up
- Posts early lines that other books price off
- Takes five-figure action on major markets
- Crypto withdrawals land inside a day
- Winning accounts do not get limited
What does not
- No US regulator to appeal a dispute to
- Interface has not been rebuilt in years
Read our full Bookmaker.eu review · How we score sportsbooks
Bonus terms, betting limits, payment methods and our hands-on testing notes are in the full review.
Taxes on Offshore Winnings
Bookmaker is not a US payer, so nothing shows up in your mailbox in January. No W-2G, no report to the IRS, no withholding.
Your obligation does not change. The IRS treats gambling winnings as fully taxable income and expects you to report them whether or not a W-2G exists (Topic no. 419). Losses are deductible only if you itemize, only up to the amount of winnings you report, and only if you kept records.
Practical version: keep your own log. Bookmaker’s bet history is your only paper trail, and the book is under no obligation to preserve it for you.
We are not accountants. If offshore volume is a real part of your year, talk to one.
Verdict: Should You Bet at Bookmaker.eu?
It depends on where you live, and it splits three ways.
No regulated market at home
California, Texas, Georgia, Minnesota and the rest have no licensed option, and Bookmaker is the most established book that will take you. You are trading regulatory protection for access. Understand that before you deposit rather than after.
Regulated market at home
Recourse and tax paperwork are already handled locally, so a Bookmaker account works as a supplement rather than a replacement. The case for one is early lines, higher limits, and a second price to shop when your local app shades a number.
Kentucky, New Jersey, Ohio or Tennessee
The signup form will not take you, and working around it puts your balance at risk. All four states have licensed online books running today. Use them.
We score Bookmaker 9.2 out of 10, weighted heaviest on safety, licensing and trust. Full breakdown in our Bookmaker.eu review, and the criteria are in how we rate sportsbooks.
21+ only. If gambling stops being entertainment, call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit ncpgambling.org. Offshore books are not covered by state self-exclusion programs.
Bookmaker.eu Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bookmaker.eu legal in California?
Is Bookmaker.eu legal in Texas?
Is Bookmaker.eu legal in Florida?
Is Bookmaker.eu legal in Washington?
Can I get in legal trouble for betting offshore?
Can I use a VPN with Bookmaker.eu?
What happens if I move to a blocked state with a funded account?
Why is Bookmaker.eu blocked in New Jersey?
Can I deposit at Bookmaker.eu with a credit card?
